Featured Amicus Briefs
Sector: Business
IN RE: DRAVO LLC
Issue: Did the Superior Court expand the concept of piercing the corporate veil in violation of the Limited Liability Company Act?
Status: Filed
Sector: Business
Amagasu v. Mitsubishi
Issue: Whether substantial remittiturs are required because the $177 million compensatory damage award and the $800 million punitive damage award are both grossly excessive.
Status: Filed
Sectors: Business, Community, Health Care
Tranter v. Z&D Tour, Inc.
Issue: Did the lower courts improperly use a heightened standard for relief under a forum non conveniens motion?
Status: Filed
Sector: Business
Syngenta v. Douglass Nemeth
PCCJR's Amicus Brief in Support of granting certiorari so the Supreme Court can review PA's jurisdiction by registration statute under the dormant commerce clause.
Status: Filed
Sectors: Business, Community, Health Care
Chilutti V UBER- Decision
PCCJR Argued that the court does not have jurisdiction over an appeal from the trial court's collateral order staying the proceedings and compelling arbitration.
Status: Decided
Sectors: Business, Community, Health Care
Bert V Turk – Supreme Court Decision
PCCJR Argued that punitive damages should be calculated on a per judgement basis, as opposed to per defendent, and a punitive to compensatory ratio of 9 to 1 or higher, was unconstitutional.
Status: Decided
Sectors: Business, Community
Mallory V Norfolk Southern -Update
To PCCJR great disappointment, a majority of the US Supreme Court has upheld the PA long arm statute requiring consent to jurisdiction to do business in PA. The PA Supreme Court declared the statute unconstitutional based on a line of US Supreme Court jurisdictional decisions involving due process.
PCCJR filed an amicus brief with the US Supreme Court in support of the PA Supreme Court’s holding in Mallory v. Norfolk Southern. This is a big blow to jurisdictional jurisprudence and due process. Now, companies with little to no substantial contacts with Pennsylvania will continue to be hauled into PA and of course, the Philadelphia court system.
Status: Filed
Sectors: Business, Community
Axial v Alltranstek
Issue: Did the lower court’s award of attorneys fees violate the American Rule that a party is responsible for its own attorneys’ fees absent (1) an express statutory provision to the contrary; (2) a “clear” agreement – i.e., an unambiguous agreement capable of no other reasonable construction – to the contrary; or (3) some other established exception.
Status: Filed
Sectors: Business, Community, Health Care
Amicus Brief in Santiago v Sky Zone
Issue: Did the Superior Court err when it held that a parent or guardian could not bind their minor child to an arbitration agreement as it violates the right to a jury trial?
Status: Filed
Sectors: Business, Community, Health Care
DiNardo v UPHS
The issue is:
Does the felony murder rule prevent a convicted murderer from seeking damages in the form of compensation for injuries the convict allegedly sustained as the result negligent medical treatment, when such treatment allegedly did not prevent him from committing the act of murder?
Status: filed
