Featured Amicus Briefs

Filter by Sector:

Sector: Business

IN RE: DRAVO LLC

Issue: Did the Superior Court expand the concept of piercing the corporate veil in violation of the Limited Liability Company Act?

Status: Filed

Sector: Business

Amagasu v. Mitsubishi

Issue: Whether substantial remittiturs are required because the $177 million compensatory damage award and the $800 million punitive damage award are both grossly excessive.

Status: Filed

Sectors: Business, Community, Health Care

Tranter v. Z&D Tour, Inc.

Issue: Did the lower courts improperly use a heightened standard for relief under a forum non conveniens motion?

Status: Filed

Sector: Business

Syngenta v. Douglass Nemeth

Brief of Amici Curiae Pennsylvania Coalition for Civil Justice Reform, American Property Casualty Insurance Association, Insurance Federation of Pennsylvania, and Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry Supporting the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

Status: Filed

Sectors: Business, Community, Health Care

Chilutti V UBER- Decision

PCCJR Argued that the court does not have jurisdiction over an appeal from the trial court's collateral order staying the proceedings and compelling arbitration.

Status: Decided

Sectors: Business, Community, Health Care

Bert V Turk – Supreme Court Decision

PCCJR Argued that punitive damages should be calculated on a per judgement basis, as opposed to per defendent, and a punitive to compensatory ratio of 9 to 1 or higher, was unconstitutional.

Status: Decided

Sectors: Business, Community

Mallory V Norfolk Southern -Update

To PCCJR great disappointment, a majority of the US Supreme Court has upheld the PA long arm statute requiring consent to jurisdiction to do business in PA. The PA Supreme Court declared the statute unconstitutional based on a line of US Supreme Court jurisdictional decisions involving due process.

PCCJR filed an amicus brief with the US Supreme Court in support of the PA Supreme Court’s holding in Mallory v. Norfolk Southern. This is a big blow to jurisdictional jurisprudence and due process. Now, companies with little to no substantial contacts with Pennsylvania will continue to be hauled into PA and of course, the Philadelphia court system.

Status: Filed

Sectors: Business, Community

Axial v Alltranstek

Issue: Did the lower court’s award of attorneys fees violate the American Rule that a party is responsible for its own attorneys’ fees absent (1) an express statutory provision to the contrary; (2) a “clear” agreement – i.e., an unambiguous agreement capable of no other reasonable construction – to the contrary; or (3) some other established exception.

Status: Filed

Sectors: Business, Community, Health Care

Amicus Brief in Santiago v Sky Zone

Issue: Did the Superior Court err when it held that a parent or guardian could not bind their minor child to an arbitration agreement as it violates the right to a jury trial?

Status: Filed

Sectors: Business, Community, Health Care

DiNardo v UPHS

The issue is:

Does the felony murder rule prevent a convicted murderer from seeking damages in the form of compensation for injuries the convict allegedly sustained as the result negligent medical treatment, when such treatment allegedly did not prevent him from committing the act of murder?

Status: filed