The use of pseudo or “junk” science in civil litigation has gained increasing traction as plaintiffs’ attorneys utilize questionable tactics in search of jackpot paydays. Former State Rep. Becky Corbin (R Chester County – 155) delved into the issue – and the impact it has on our civil litigation system and our society as a whole – in an opinion piece published in the DC Journal.
“Attorneys are increasingly relying on questionable studies and dubious expert testimony to attack common consumer products, from sunscreen and baby powder to everyday cleaning supplies…these lawsuits are often driven not by credible scientific evidence but by profit incentives and fear-based narratives…This erosion of scientific integrity poses risks. When flawed or agenda-driven science is presented to juries, it undermines public confidence in science and the judicial system,” Corbin writes.
She goes on to call on judges to act as gatekeepers to keep junk science testimonials out of the courts and for policymakers and leaders to demand that junk science claims are debunked in order to stop misinformation from wide-spread circulation.